Whilst it is certainly the case that the MPs and the constituencies they represent will have somewhat varying priorities, it is equally certainly the case that the Westcountry constituencies have more interests in common than they have differences. In particular, it is in the interests of all that none of our hospitals is closed, down-graded or deprived of vital resources, since any closure, total or partial of one, will have a knock-on effect on all.
I will be paying close attention over the coming months to see which, if any, of the Westcountry MPs puts loyalty to his or her constituency ahead of blind loyalty to a dangerous and unpopular party policy, which, in truth, has no part in the Conservative Party that I used to know.
Geoffrey Cox, the MP for our neighbouring constituency of Torridge and West Devon, also retained his seat.
In reality, of course, A&E is very unlikely to be chosen for closure. Neither is it even remotely likely that the hospital as a whole would be closed – I think that the NHS bosses would have to be criminally insane to contemplate either of these options. What is much more likely, unless we can prevent it, is that one or more of the specialist departments would be moved to Exeter or Plymouth. We have already lost ENT, and maternity and stroke have been mentioned as possible casualties. What then happens is that the hospital becomes increasingly less attractive for consultants and ambitious healthcare workers and so more departments close because they cannot get the staff. Eventually, the hospital becomes little more than a glorified community hospital – a larger version of the Tyrrell of old – with an A&E which is no more than a minor injuries unit and wards consisting of recovery beds only. Do we want that?
And meanwhile, no doubt you have seen the report that Dr Alison Diamond circulated a memo to staff setting out three options to deal with what she called “a number of bed capacity issues which impacted the quality of care we were able to offer patients at NDDH”, in other words, there were not enough beds to deal with the patients requiring them. Each option suggest one or two things and ends “and close Alex”. Now, let’s run that through again. Last year, patient care suffered because there were not enough beds, so the solution involves closing a ward full of beds? Someone around here is bonkers, and I don’t think it is me.
I finally made it to the Landmark café today and had a cup of coffee. To be honest, the coffee was not to my taste, but, at least, it was made in one of those impressive and noisy machines full of dials, levers, steam and probably Italian voodoo. At the moment, the offering at the café is very limited – tea, coffee, a variety of other drinks (I saw alcoholic drinks on display, so I assume those will be available at suitable times), cakes and crisps. Nothing that requires cooking or, apart from tea and coffee, anything that requires any degree of preparation. Apparently, the café is looking for a chef, whereupon a full menu will be offered, so, if you know of a chef who is looking for work, please point him or her in the right direction! Judging by the admittedly short time I was there, when the only customers were me and my wife, they are not currently over busy. The sooner they get busy, the better, as the café and Landmark as a whole are now run as a commercial concern and we are unlikely to see much more activity there unless the managers can see a potential profit.
And finally, an elderly lady, living in Hillington, has received a letter from the planning officer of NDDC advising that she has 21 days to comment on plans for a 12.5 metre mast which it is proposed to erect next to her bungalow. 12.5 metres is just over 41 feet and is about twice as high as a modern lamppost nearby. I suppose the mast is for communications, possibly mobile phone, but does it have to be so close to a home? After all, it’s not as though there is not a lot of open space around our town.
Also, the lady tells me that no other neighbour that she has asked has received a similar notice. Why is this? Is she considered the only person having an interest in whether a 41 foot mast is erected in their neighbourhood?